On this page, you'll find all the data tables for the charts in our Who is our funding reaching report.
To see the charts and initial analysis, click on the relevant links below:
Who is our funding reaching
Charts 1 and 2 show how our funding compares to data we gathered on applications. Chart 1 looks at the communities the work supports and chart 2 looks at the organisation's leadership.
Chart 1: Communities the work supports: funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of applications | |
|---|---|---|
|
Children and young people |
14.8% | 16.9% |
|
Communities experiencing racial inequity |
13.0% | 17.9% |
|
Disabled people |
9.7% | 12.9% |
|
Educationally or economically disadvantaged |
14.4% | 23.1% |
|
Faith communities |
1.4% | 1.1% |
|
LGBT+ people |
5.3% | 6.4% |
| Migrants | 8.8% | 7.1% |
|
Older people |
1.2% | 2.2% |
|
Women and girls |
7.2% | 9.7% |
|
No specific group |
55.0% | 50.1% |
Chart 2: Leadership: funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of our applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Children and young people | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Communities experiencing racial inequity | 7.4% | 9.4% |
| Disabled people | 9.7% | 13.0% |
|
Educationally or economically disadvantaged |
2.8% | 4.9% |
| Faith communities | 0.7% | 2.2% |
| LGBT+ people | 3.5% | 4.5% |
| Migrants | 8.8% | 7.1% |
| Older people | 0.5% | 2.0% |
| Women and girls | 16.0% | 16.1% |
| No specific group | 64.0% | 57.8% |
Average amount awarded in our funding
Charts 3 and 4 show the average amount awarded in our funding: chart 3 looks at the communities the work supports and chart 4 looks at the organisation's leadership.
Chart 3: Communities the work supports in our funding - average awarded amount
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| Children and young people | £178,771 (64) |
| Communities experiencing racial inequity | £177,483 (56) |
| Disabled people | £170,648 (42) |
| Educationally or economically disadvantaged | £182,778 (62) |
| Faith communities | £232,471 (6) |
| LGBT+ people | £234,197 (23) |
| Migrants | £221,818 (38) |
| Older people | £142,805 (5) |
| Women and girls | £217,098 (31) |
| No specific group | £236,827 (237) |
| Total portfolio | £210,824 (431) |
Chart 4: Leadership in our funding - average awarded amount
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| Children and young people | £154,417 (6) |
| Communities experiencing racial inequity | £168,000 (32) |
| Disabled people | £170,648 (42) |
|
Educationally or economically disadvantaged |
£154,179 (12) |
| Faith communities | £196,943 (3) |
| LGBT+ people | £191,037 (15) |
| Migrants | £221,818 (38) |
| Older people | £300,000 (2) |
| Women and girls | £170,213 (69) |
| No specific group | £232,223 (275) |
| Total portfolio | £210,824 (431) |
Communities experiencing racial inequity
Charts 1 and 2 show the number of organisations we classify as 'communities experiencing racial inequity' for the three areas we asked organisations about: the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission. It further breaks the data down by a specific ethnicity where relevant. Organisations could also select 'all communities experiencing racial inequity'.
They also show the number of organisations whose work, leadership or mission did not specifically relate to 'communities experiencing racial inequity'. We have classified them as 'no specific group'.
Chart 1: Communities experiencing racial inequity in our funding
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asian/Asian British | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Black/African/Caribbean/Black British | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| Other group experiencing racial inequity | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Mixed heritage | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| All communities experiencing racial inequity | 41 | 17 | 45 |
| No specific group | 375 | 399 | 375 |
Chart 2: Communities experiencing racial inequity in applications
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asian/Asian British | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Black/African/Caribbean/Black British | 11 | 13 | 8 |
| Other group experiencing racial inequity | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| Mixed heritage | 6 | 3 | 0 |
| All communities experiencing racial inequity | 93 | 37 | 88 |
| No specific group | 583 | 638 | 598 |
Our funding vs applications
Chart 3 shows how our funding compares to data we have gathered on applications received. Figures show the percentage that we have classified as 'communities experiencing racial inequity' for the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission.
Chart 3: Communities experiencing racial inequity: our funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Communities the work supports | 13.0% | 17.5% |
| Leadership | 7.4% | 9.3% |
| Mission | 13.0% | 15.1% |
Average amount awarded
Chart 4 shows the average amount awarded in our funding, and compares the average amount awarded for our total funding portfolio with funding for work specifically supporting communities experiencing racial inequity, and funding for organisations led by communities experiencing racial inequity.
Chart 4: Average amount awarded: communities experiencing racial inequity
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| The work supports communities experiencing racial inequity | £177,483 (56) |
| The organisation is led by communities experiencing racial inequity | £168,000 (32) |
| Our total funding average | £210,824 (431) |
Our funding - by aim
Chart 5 shows the number of organisations in our funding that we classify as 'communities experiencing racial inequity' along with which of our aims the grant aligns to most closely.
Chart 5: Communities experiencing racial inequity in our funding - by aim
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fairer Future | 46 | 29 | 45 |
| Creative, Confident Communities | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Our Natural World | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Infrastructure and New Ideas | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Previous strategy | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| No specific group | 375 | 399 | 375 |
Disabled people
Charts 1 and 2 show the number of organisations we classify as 'disabled people' for the three areas we asked organisations about: the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission. It further breaks the data down by the type of disability where it was included.
The charts also show the number of organisations whose work, leadership or mission did not specifically relate to 'disabled people'. We have classified them as 'no specific group'.
Chart 1: Disabled people in our funding
| null | Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive differences | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Health | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Mental health | 5 | 5 | 1 |
| Physical impairments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| All disabled people | 26 | 27 | 30 |
| No specific group | 389 | 389 | 391 |
Chart 2: Disabled people in applications
| null | Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive differences | 21 | 21 | 19 |
| Health | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Mental health | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| Physical impairments | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Other | 11 | 11 | 15 |
| All disabled people | 43 | 43 | 59 |
| No specific group | 614 | 614 | 590 |
Our funding vs applications
Chart 3 shows how our funding compares to data we have gathered on applications. Figures show the percentage that we have classified as 'disabled people' for the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission.
Chart 3: Disabled people: our funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of our applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Communities the work supports | 9.7% | 13.0% |
| Leadership | 9.7% | 13.0% |
| Mission | 9.3% | 16.2% |
Average amount awarded
Chart 4 shows the average amount awarded in our funding, and compares the average for our total funding portfolio with funding for work specifically supporting disabled people, and funding for organisations led by disabled people.
Chart 4: Average amount awarded: disabled people
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| The work supports disabled people | £170,648 (42) |
| The organisation is led by disabled people | £170,648 (42) |
| Our total funding average | £210,824 (431) |
Our funding by aim
Chart 5 shows the number of organisations in our funding that we classify as 'disabled people' and the aim which the funding most closely aligns to.
Chart 5: Disabled people in our funding - by aim
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fairer Future | 33 | 33 | 31 |
| Creative, Confident Communities | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Our Natural World | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Infrastructure and New Ideas | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Previous strategy | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| No specific group | 389 | 389 | 391 |
People who are educationally of economically disadvantaged
Charts 1 and 2 below show the number of organisations in our funding and applications received that we classify as 'educationally or economically disadvantaged' for the three areas we asked organisations about: the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission. They also show the number of organisations whose work, leadership or mission did not specifically relate to 'people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged'. We have classified these as 'no specific group' for this category.
Chart 1: People who are educationally or economically disadvantaged in our portfolio
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educationally or economically disadvantaged | 62 | 12 | 73 |
| No specific group | 369 | 419 | 358 |
Chart 2: People who are educationally or economically disadvantaged in applications
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educationally or economically disadvantaged | 163 | 35 | 171 |
| No specific group | 545 | 670 | 534 |
Our funding vs applications
Chart 3 shows how our funding compares to data we have gathered on applications. Figures show the percentage that we have classified as 'educationally or economically disadvantaged' for the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission.
Chart 3: People who are educationally or economically disadvantaged: our funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of our applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Communities the work supports | 14.4% | 23.0% |
| Leadership | 2.8% | 5.0% |
| Mission | 16.9% | 24.3% |
Average amount awarded
Chart 4 shows the average amount awarded in our funding, and compares the average for our total funding portfolio with funding for work specifically supporting people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged, and funding for organisations led by people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged.
Chart 4: Average amount awarded: people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| The work supports people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged | £182,778 (62) |
| The organisation is led by people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged | £154,179 (12) |
| Our total funding average | £210,824 (431) |
Our funding by aim
Chart 5 shows the number of organisations in our funding that we classify as for work or as being led by people who are educationally or economically disadvantaged, and the aim which the funding most closely aligns to.
Chart 5: People who are educationally or economically disadvantaged in our funding - by aim
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fairer Future | 43 | 8 | 45 |
| Creative, Confident Communities | 14 | 2 | 13 |
| Our Natural World | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| Infrastructure and New Ideas | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Previous strategy | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| No specific group | 369 | 419 | 358 |
LGBT+ people
Charts 1 and 2 show the number of organisations in our funding that we classify as 'LGBT+ people' for the three areas we asked organisations about: the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission. They also show the number of organisations whose work, leadership or mission did not specifically relate to 'LGBT+ people'. We have classified them as 'no specific group'.
Chart 1: LGBT+ people in our funding
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bisexual people | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gay men | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Lesbian/gay women | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Non-binary people | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trans people | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| All LGBT+ people | 19 | 8 | 17 |
| No specific group | 408 | 416 | 413 |
Chart 2: LGBT+ people in applications
| null | Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bisexual people | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Gay men | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Lesbian/gay women | 0 | 7 | 1 |
| Non-binary people | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Trans people | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Other | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| All LGBT+ people | 37 | 16 | 45 |
| No specific group | 661 | 673 | 654 |
Our funding vs applications
Chart 3 shows how our funding compares to our data on applications. Figures show the percentage that we have classified as 'LGBT+ people' for the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission.
Chart 3: LGBT+ people: our funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Communities the work supports | 5.3% | 6.1% |
| Leadership | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| Mission | 4.2% | 7.1% |
Average amount awarded
Chart 4 shows the average amount awarded in our funding, and compares the average for our total funding portfolio with funding for work specifically supporting LGBT+ people, and funding for organisations led by LGBT+ people.
Chart 4: Average amount awarded: LGBT+ people
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| The work supports LGBT+ people | £234,197 (23) |
| The organisation is led by LGBT+ people | £191,037 (15) |
| Our total funding average | £210,824 (431) |
Our funding by aim
Chart 5 shows the number of funded organisations that we classify as 'LGBT+ people' and the aim which the funding most closely aligns to.
Chart 5: LGBT+ people in our funding - by aim
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fairer Future | 19 | 12 | 12 |
| Creative, Confident Communities | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Our Natural World | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Infrastructure and New Ideas | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Previous strategy | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| No specific group | 408 | 416 | 413 |
Migrants
Charts 1 and 2 below show the number of organisations we classify as 'migrants' for the three areas we asked organisations about: the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission. It further breaks the data down by a specific status where relevant. Organisations could also select 'all migrants'.
They also show the number of organisations whose work, leadership or mission did not specifically relate to 'migrants'. We have classified these as 'no specific group'.
Chart 1: Migrants in our funding
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asylum seekers | 12 | 12 | 10 |
| Refugees | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Undocumented people | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other migrants | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| All migrants | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| No specific group | 393 | 393 | 394 |
Chart 2: Migrants in applications
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asylum seekers | 9 | 9 | 7 |
| Refugees | 17 | 17 | 18 |
| Undocumented people | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other migrants | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| All migrants | 24 | 24 | 26 |
| No specific group | 653 | 653 | 653 |
Our funding vs applications
Chart 3 shows how our funding compares to data we have gathered on applications. Figures show the percentage that we have classified as 'migrants' for the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission.
Chart 3: Migrants: our funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of our applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Communities the work supports | 8.8% | 7.2% |
| Leadership | 8.8% | 7.2% |
| Mission | 8.3% | 7.5% |
Average amount awarded
Chart 4 shows the average amount awarded in our funding, and compares the average for all our funding (our active portfolio) with funding for work specifically supporting migrants, and funding for organisations led by migrants.
Chart 4: Average amount awarded: Migrants
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| The work supports migrants | £221,818 (38) |
| The organisation is led by migrants | £221,818 (38) |
| Our total funding average | £210,824 (431) |
Our funding - by aim
Chart 5 shows the number of funded organisations that we classify as 'migrants' along with which of our aims the funding aligns to most closely.
Chart 5: Migrants in our funding - by aim
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fairer Future | 33 | 33 | 31 |
| Creative, Confident Communities | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Our Natural World | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Infrastructure and New Ideas | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Previous strategy | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| No specific group | 393 | 393 | 394 |
Women and girls
Charts 1 and 2 show the percentage and number of organisations (in brackets) we classify as 'women and girls' for the three areas we asked organisations about: the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission.
The charts also show the number of organisations whose work, leadership or mission did not specifically relate to women and girls. We have classified them as 'no specific group'.
Chart 1: Women and girls in our funding
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Women and girls | 34 | 74 | 35 |
| No specific group | 397 | 357 | 396 |
Chart 2: Women and girls in applications
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Women and girls | 67 | 113 | 61 |
| No specific group | 639 | 592 | 644 |
Our funding vs applications
Chart 3 shows how our funding compares to data we have gathered on applications. Figures show the percentage that we have classified as 'women and girls' for the communities the work supports, the organisation's leadership, and the organisation's mission.
Chart 3: Women and girls: our funding vs applications
| % of our funding | % of applications | |
|---|---|---|
| Communities the work supports | 7.9% | 9.5% |
| Leadership | 17.2% | 16.0% |
| Mission | 8.1% | 8.7% |
Average amount awarded
Chart 4 shows the average amount awarded in our funding, and compares the average for our total funding portfolio with funding for work specifically supporting women and girls, and funding for organisations led by women and girls.
Chart 4: Average amount awarded: women and girls
| Average amount awarded (# of funding awards) | |
|---|---|
| The work supports women and girls | £217,098 (31) |
| The organisation is led by women and girls | £170,213 (69) |
| Our total funding average | £210,824 (431) |
Our funding by aim
Chart 5 shows the number of funded organisations that we classify as 'women and girls' and the aim which the funding most closely aligns to.
Chart 5: Women and girls in our funding - by aim
| Communities the work supports | Leadership | Mission | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Fairer Future | 30 | 51 | 32 |
| Creative, Confident Communities | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| Our Natural World | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Infrastructure and New Ideas | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Previous strategy | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| No specific group | 397 | 357 | 396 |