We are trying to reduce the number of applications we receive, and the accompanying amount of wasted time and effort. We hope that being clearer about what we turn down will help.
We appreciate the huge amount of work that goes into making a funding application. Please check your answers to these questions before investing time in applying:
We turned down 32% - 691 applications - in the past year for this reason.
We strongly advise you read about what we fund and what we don't fund. Please don’t try to fit a square peg into a round hole - if your work genuinely doesn't fit with our priorities then your efforts may be better focused on applying to other funders.
We turned down 29% - 629 applications - in the past year for this reason.
With limited funds it is very difficult for us to prioritise between the many excellent, but similar, organisations that apply to us, this is no reflection on the quality or importance of this work. Successful projects will be a strong match to one of our aims and are likely to produce learning which can be shared with/have implications for the wider sector.
Examples of what we don’t fund includes workshop delivery, advice centres, volunteer development, ESOL provision, standard work to improve employability skills, refuges, hostels, night shelters and standard services for homeless people, sports associations, playgroups, play schemes, out of school clubs, supplementary schools, playgroups, youth clubs and general capacity building/ professional development.
We turned down 16% - 341 applications - in the past year for this reason.
With limited funds, we need to make the most effective use of our money. We can only fund work which makes a wider impact - beyond the immediate beneficiaries and life of the project. Community organisations such as youth clubs, community centres, volunteer groups, leisure activities and local orchestras play an important role in people's lives, but we can only fund these if the work is exceptional and likely to influence practice more widely. We cannot fund academic research unless the plans and partnerships are in place to deliver a practical impact as a result of its findings.
We turned down 13% - 293 applications – in the past year for this reason.
We need to see that organisations are best placed to provide the work they do. Evidence of past impact, and how you’ve learned from it, helps us to make this judgement. If your organisation is new, we need to see that your plans are based on sound evidence or learning from elsewhere.
We turned down 5%, 115 applications - in the past year for this reason.
Your application will need to be specific about the proposed work, the beneficiaries, the organisation’s track record and partnerships to reach our second stage. Please ensure you have read through what we fund, our application guidance and FAQs before deciding whether to apply.
We turned down 3% - 66 applications - in the past year for this reason.
We need to see that organisations are best placed to provide the work they do. If your organisation is new, we need to see evidence that you have the right people, partnerships and processes in place.
We turned down 1% - 29 applications - in the past year for this reason.
We try and give priority to work in parts of the UK with limited access to resource and opportunities. These areas might be experiencing geographic isolation, high levels of deprivation, social and/or economic disadvantage.
03 October 2017
Tel: 020 7812 3700
Charity No. 200051